Stormshield: >> Stormshield Network Security >> 4.2.13 Security Vulnerabilities
An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 3.7.0 through 3.7.38 before 3.7.39, 3.10.0 through 3.11.26 before 3.11.27, 4.0 through 4.3.21 before 4.3.22, and 4.4.0 through 4.6.8 before 4.6.9. An administrator with write access to the SNS firewall can configure a login disclaimer with malicious JavaScript elements that can result in data theft.
CVSS Score
4.8
EPSS Score
0.006
Published
2024-02-29
In Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 1.0.0 through 3.7.36 before 3.7.37, 3.8.0 through 3.11.24 before 3.11.25, 4.0.0 through 4.3.18 before 4.3.19, 4.4.0 through 4.6.5 before 4.6.6, and 4.7.0 before 4.7.1, the usage of a Network object created from an inactive DHCP interface in the filtering slot results in the usage of an object of the :any" type, which may have unexpected results for access control.
CVSS Score
7.3
EPSS Score
0.003
Published
2024-02-29
An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 4.3.17, 4.4.x through 4.6.x before 4.6.4, and 4.7.x before 4.7.1. It affects user accounts for which the password has an equals sign or space character. The serverd process logs such passwords in cleartext, and potentially sends these logs to the Syslog component.
CVSS Score
7.5
EPSS Score
0.001
Published
2023-12-26
An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 4.0.0 through 4.3.21, 4.4.0 through 4.6.8, and 4.7.0. Sending a crafted ICMP packet may lead to a crash of the ASQ engine.
CVSS Score
6.5
EPSS Score
0.001
Published
2023-12-21
There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing
inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but
the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type
of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by
the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an
ASN1_STRING.
When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the
X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass
arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or
enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to
provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a
valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other
input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which
is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect
applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs
over a network.
CVSS Score
7.4
EPSS Score
0.891
Published
2023-02-08
A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation
which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a
Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker
would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for
decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5,
RSA-OEAP and RSASVE.
For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an
encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a
genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send
trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a
sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master
secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the
application data sent over that connection.
CVSS Score
5.9
EPSS Score
0.002
Published
2023-02-08
The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and
decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data.
If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are
populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The
caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a
PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex()
will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer
to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer
then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This
could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM
files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack.
The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around
PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected.
These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL
functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and
SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal
uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the
header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations
include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in
OpenSSL 3.0.
The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.
CVSS Score
7.5
EPSS Score
0.001
Published
2023-02-08
The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE.
CVSS Score
7.5
EPSS Score
0.116
Published
2021-11-11
The L2TP implementation of MPD before 5.9 allows a remote attacker who can send specifically crafted L2TP control packet with AVP Q.931 Cause Code to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption).
CVSS Score
9.8
EPSS Score
0.03
Published
2020-10-06
The PPP implementation of MPD before 5.9 allows a remote attacker who can send specifically crafted PPP authentication message to cause the daemon to read beyond allocated memory buffer, which would result in a denial of service condition.
CVSS Score
7.5
EPSS Score
0.017
Published
2020-10-06
Page 1