Integer overflow in Tor before 0.1.1.20 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted large inputs, which result in a buffer overflow when elements are added to smartlists.
Tor before 0.1.1.20 creates "internal circuits" primarily consisting of nodes with "useful exit nodes," which allows remote attackers to conduct unspecified statistical attacks.
TLS handshakes in Tor before 0.1.1.20 generate public-private keys based on TLS context rather than the connection, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force attacks on the encryption keys.
Tor before 0.1.1.20 does not sufficiently obey certain firewall options, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions for dirservers, direct connections, or proxy servers.
The privoxy configuration file in Tor before 0.1.1.20, when run on Apple OS X, logs all data via the "logfile", which allows attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information.
Tor before 0.1.1.20 supports server descriptors that contain hostnames instead of IP addresses, which allows remote attackers to arbitrarily group users by providing preferential address resolution.
Tor before 0.1.1.20 uses improper logic to validate the "OR" destination, which allows remote attackers to perform a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack via unspecified vectors.
Tor before 0.1.1.20 kills the circuit when it receives an unrecognized relay command, which causes network circuits to be disbanded. NOTE: while this item is listed under the "Security fixes" section of the developer changelog, the developer clarified on 20060707 that this is only a self-DoS. Therefore this issue should not be included in CVE
Tor client before 0.1.1.20 prefers entry points based on is_fast or is_stable flags, which could allow remote attackers to be preferred over nodes that are identified as more trustworthy "entry guard" (is_guard) systems by directory authorities.
Tor before 0.1.1.20 does not validate that a server descriptor's fingerprint line matches its identity key, which allows remote attackers to spoof the fingerprint line, which might be trusted by users or other applications.