Security Vulnerabilities
- CVEs Published In September 2024
A SQL injection vulnerability in linlinjava litemall 1.8.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the goodsId, goodsSn, and name parameters in AdminGoodscontroller.java.
A flaw was found in QEMU. An assertion failure was present in the usb_ep_get() function in hw/net/core.c when trying to get the USB endpoint from a USB device. This flaw may allow a malicious unprivileged guest user to crash the QEMU process on the host and cause a denial of service condition.
This vulnerability exists in Apex Softcell LD Geo due to improper validation of the certain parameters (Client ID, DPID or BOID) in the API endpoint. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameters in the API request body leading to exposure of sensitive information belonging to other users.
This vulnerability exists in Apex Softcell LD Geo due to missing restrictions for excessive failed authentication attempts on its API based login. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by conducting a brute force attack on login OTP, which could lead to gain unauthorized access to other user accounts.
This vulnerability exists in the Apex Softcell LD Geo due to improper validation of the transaction token ID in the API endpoint. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the transaction token ID in the API request leading to unauthorized access and modification of transactions belonging to other users.
This vulnerability exists in Apex Softcell LD DP Back Office due to improper implementation of OTP validation mechanism in certain API endpoints. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing arbitrary OTP value for authentication and subsequently changing its API response.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass OTP verification for other user accounts.
This vulnerability exists in Apex Softcell LD DP Back Office due to improper validation of certain parameters (cCdslClicentcode and cLdClientCode) in the API endpoint. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameters in the API request body leading to exposure of sensitive information belonging to other users.
langchain_experimental (aka LangChain Experimental) 0.1.17 through 0.3.0 for LangChain allows attackers to execute arbitrary code through sympy.sympify (which uses eval) in LLMSymbolicMathChain. LLMSymbolicMathChain was introduced in fcccde406dd9e9b05fc9babcbeb9ff527b0ec0c6 (2023-10-05).
The WP Custom Fields Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's wpcfs-preset shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.35 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
The MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'email' parameter when a placeholder such as {email} is used for the field in versions 4.9.9 to 4.9.16 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.