Security Vulnerabilities
- CVEs Published In July 2019
In Joget Workflow 6.0.20, CSV Injection, also known as Formula Injection, exists, as demonstrated by jw/web/userview/crm_community/crm_userview_sales/_/account_new with the Account ID or Account Name field. NOTE: the vendor disputes the relevance of this finding because CSV is not the intended export format for spreadsheet applications
EspoCRM version 5.6.4 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in the api/v1/Document functionality for storing documents in the account tab. An attacker can upload a crafted file that contains JavaScript code in its name. This code will be executed when a user opens a page of any profile with this.
EspoCRM 5.6.4 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in the Knowledge base. A malicious attacker can inject JavaScript code in the body parameter during api/v1/KnowledgeBaseArticle knowledge-base record creation.
EspoCRM 5.6.4 is vulnerable to user password hash enumeration. A malicious authenticated attacker can brute-force a user password hash by 1 symbol at a time using specially crafted api/v1/User?filterList filters.
The Simple Membership plugin before 3.8.5 for WordPress has CSRF affecting the Bulk Operation section.
An issue was discovered in EspoCRM before 5.6.6. There is stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in Create Task. A malicious attacker can modify the parameter name to contain JavaScript code.
An issue was discovered in EspoCRM before 5.6.6. Stored XSS exists due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in Create Case. A malicious attacker can modify the firstName and lastName to contain JavaScript code.
An issue was discovered in EspoCRM before 5.6.6. Stored XSS exists due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in Create User. A malicious attacker can modify the firstName and lastName to contain JavaScript code.
In Pallets Werkzeug before 0.15.5, SharedDataMiddleware mishandles drive names (such as C:) in Windows pathnames.
SSDP Responder 1.x through 1.5 mishandles incoming network messages, leading to a stack-based buffer overflow by 1 byte. This results in a crash of the server, but only when strict stack checking is enabled. This is caused by an off-by-one error in ssdp_recv in ssdpd.c.