Security Vulnerabilities - CVEs Published In May 2024
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5 reflected XSS via OAuth provider configuration was possible
CVSS Score
4.6
EPSS Score
0.007
Published
2024-05-29
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5 stored XSS via issue tracker integration was possible
CVSS Score
4.6
EPSS Score
0.424
Published
2024-05-29
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5, 2024.03.2 path traversal allowing to read files from server was possible
CVSS Score
6.5
EPSS Score
0.0
Published
2024-05-29
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5 several Stored XSS in code inspection reports were possible
CVSS Score
4.6
EPSS Score
0.424
Published
2024-05-29
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5 improper access control in Pull Requests and Commit status publisher build features was possible
CVSS Score
6.5
EPSS Score
0.0
Published
2024-05-29
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5, 2024.03.2 a third-party agent could impersonate a cloud agent
CVSS Score
6.8
EPSS Score
0.0
Published
2024-05-29
The HUSKY – Products Filter Professional for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's shortcode(s) in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.5.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
CVSS Score
6.4
EPSS Score
0.004
Published
2024-05-29
IBM Db2 on Cloud Pak for Data and Db2 Warehouse on Cloud Pak for Data 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, and 4.8 could allow a user with access to the Kubernetes pod, to make system calls compromising the security of containers. IBM X-Force ID: 265264.
CVSS Score
7.4
EPSS Score
0.001
Published
2024-05-29
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent
This patch is based on a detailed report and ideas from Yepeng Pan
and Christian Rossow.
ACK seq validation is currently following RFC 5961 5.2 guidelines:
The ACK value is considered acceptable only if
it is in the range of ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <=
SND.NXT). All incoming segments whose ACK value doesn't satisfy the
above condition MUST be discarded and an ACK sent back. It needs to
be noted that RFC 793 on page 72 (fifth check) says: "If the ACK is a
duplicate (SEG.ACK < SND.UNA), it can be ignored. If the ACK
acknowledges something not yet sent (SEG.ACK > SND.NXT) then send an
ACK, drop the segment, and return". The "ignored" above implies that
the processing of the incoming data segment continues, which means
the ACK value is treated as acceptable. This mitigation makes the
ACK check more stringent since any ACK < SND.UNA wouldn't be
accepted, instead only ACKs that are in the range ((SND.UNA -
MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT) get through.
This can be refined for new (and possibly spoofed) flows,
by not accepting ACK for bytes that were never sent.
This greatly improves TCP security at a little cost.
I added a Fixes: tag to make sure this patch will reach stable trees,
even if the 'blamed' patch was adhering to the RFC.
tp->bytes_acked was added in linux-4.2
Following packetdrill test (courtesy of Yepeng Pan) shows
the issue at hand:
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1024) = 0
// ---------------- Handshake ------------------- //
// when window scale is set to 14 the window size can be extended to
// 65535 * (2^14) = 1073725440. Linux would accept an ACK packet
// with ack number in (Server_ISN+1-1073725440. Server_ISN+1)
// ,though this ack number acknowledges some data never
// sent by the server.
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 65535 <mss 1400,nop,wscale 14>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <...>
+0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65535
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
// For the established connection, we send an ACK packet,
// the ack packet uses ack number 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32,
// where 2^32 is used to wrap around.
// Note: we used 1073725300 instead of 1073725440 to avoid possible
// edge cases.
// 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32 = 3221241997
// Oops, old kernels happily accept this packet.
+0 < . 1:1001(1000) ack 3221241997 win 65535
// After the kernel fix the following will be replaced by a challenge ACK,
// and prior malicious frame would be dropped.
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001
CVSS Score
5.5
EPSS Score
0.0
Published
2024-05-29
Zoho ManageEngine PAM360 is vulnerable to Stored XSS vulnerability. This vulnerability is applicable only in the version 6610.
CVSS Score
6.3
EPSS Score
0.01
Published
2024-05-29