Security Vulnerabilities
- CVEs Published In April 2024
An issue in Fireboltt Dream Wristphone BSW202_FB_AAC_v2.0_20240110-20240110-1956 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted deauth frame.
An arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the Add Category function of Codoforum v4.9 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via uploading a crafted file.
HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch does not invalidate session after logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system.
HCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch is vulnerable to sensitive information disclosure vulnerability due to insufficient obfuscation of sensitive values.
Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Insurance Management System v1.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the Category Name parameter at /core/new_category2.
A cross-site scripting (XSS) in Cosmetics and Beauty Product Online Store v1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the Product Name parameter.
A cross-site scripting (XSS) in Cosmetics and Beauty Product Online Store v1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the Last Name parameter.
A cross-site scripting (XSS) in Cosmetics and Beauty Product Online Store v1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the Search parameter.
A Stack Overflow vulnerability in Tenda AC15 v15.03.05.18 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via the LISTEN parameter in the fromDhcpListClient function.
In PuTTY 0.68 through 0.80 before 0.81, biased ECDSA nonce generation allows an attacker to recover a user's NIST P-521 secret key via a quick attack in approximately 60 signatures. This is especially important in a scenario where an adversary is able to read messages signed by PuTTY or Pageant. The required set of signed messages may be publicly readable because they are stored in a public Git service that supports use of SSH for commit signing, and the signatures were made by Pageant through an agent-forwarding mechanism. In other words, an adversary may already have enough signature information to compromise a victim's private key, even if there is no further use of vulnerable PuTTY versions. After a key compromise, an adversary may be able to conduct supply-chain attacks on software maintained in Git. A second, independent scenario is that the adversary is an operator of an SSH server to which the victim authenticates (for remote login or file copy), even though this server is not fully trusted by the victim, and the victim uses the same private key for SSH connections to other services operated by other entities. Here, the rogue server operator (who would otherwise have no way to determine the victim's private key) can derive the victim's private key, and then use it for unauthorized access to those other services. If the other services include Git services, then again it may be possible to conduct supply-chain attacks on software maintained in Git. This also affects, for example, FileZilla before 3.67.0, WinSCP before 6.3.3, TortoiseGit before 2.15.0.1, and TortoiseSVN through 1.14.6.