Security Vulnerabilities
- CVEs Published In March 2020
Some Kyocera printers (such as the ECOSYS M5526cdw 2R7_2000.001.701) were affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability in the okhtmlfile and failhtmlfile parameters of several functionalities of the web application that would allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform a Denial of Service attack, crashing the device, or potentially execute arbitrary code on the device.
Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices have an Authentication Method Vulnerable to Brute Force Attacks. Some Ricoh printers did not implement account lockout. Therefore, it was possible to obtain the local account credentials by brute force.
Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices allow denial of service (issue 1 of 3). Some Ricoh printers were affected by a wrong LPD service implementation that lead to a denial of service vulnerability.
Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices have a fixed password. FTP service credential were found to be hardcoded within the printer firmware. This would allow to an attacker to access and read information stored on the shared FTP folders.
Ricoh SP C250DN 1.05 devices allow denial of service (issue 2 of 3). Unauthenticated crafted packets to the IPP service will cause a vulnerable device to crash. A memory corruption has been identified in the way of how the embedded device parsed the IPP packets
An issue was discovered in Halvotec RaQuest 10.23.10801.0. One of the exposed web services allows an anonymous user to access the list of connected users as well as the session cookie for each user. Fixed in Release 10.24.11206.1
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) were affected by one or more stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the Google Cloud Print implementation that would allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device. This was caused by an insecure handling of the register parameters, because the size used within a memcpy() function, which copied the action value into a local variable, was not checked properly.
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) were affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability in the Authentication Cookie of the web application that would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device.
Some Brother printers (such as the HL-L8360CDW v1.20) were affected by a heap buffer overflow vulnerability as the IPP service did not parse attribute names properly. This would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device.
Some Brother printers (such as the HL-L8360CDW v1.20) were affected by a stack buffer overflow vulnerability as the web server did not parse the cookie value properly. This would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device.