Security Vulnerabilities
- CVEs Published In January 2018
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Help.aspx in mojoPortal version 2.5.0.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the helpkey parameter. Exploitation requires authenticated reflected cross-site scripting for user accounts assigned either the "Administrators" or "Content Administrators" role.
Bro before Bro v2.5.2 is vulnerable to an out of bounds write in the ContentLine analyzer allowing remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly other exploitation.
GuixSD prior to Git commit 5e66574a128937e7f2fcf146d146225703ccfd5d used POSIX hard links incorrectly, leading the creation of setuid executables in "the store", violating a fundamental security assumption of GNU Guix.
IBM WebSphere MQ 8.0 and 9.0 could allow an authenticated user with authority to send a specially crafted request that could cause a channel process to cease processing further requests. IBM X-Force ID: 131547.
Linaro's open source TEE solution called OP-TEE, version 2.4.0 (and older) is vulnerable to the bellcore attack in the LibTomCrypt code resulting in compromised private RSA key.
Linaro's open source TEE solution called OP-TEE, version 2.4.0 (and older) is vulnerable a timing attack in the Montgomery parts of libMPA in OP-TEE resulting in a compromised private RSA key.
Structured Data Linter versions 2.4.1 and older are vulnerable to a directory traversal attack in the URL input field resulting in the possibility of disclosing information about the remote host.
In opencv/modules/imgcodecs/src/utils.cpp, functions FillUniColor and FillUniGray do not check the input length, which can lead to integer overflow. If the image is from remote, may lead to remote code execution or denial of service. This affects Opencv 3.3 and earlier.
fs-git is a file system like api for git repository. The fs-git version 1.0.1 module relies on child_process.exec, however, the buildCommand method used to construct exec strings does not properly sanitize data and is vulnerable to command injection across all methods that use it and call exec.
An XML Signature Wrapping vulnerability exists in Samlify 2.2.0 and earlier, and in predecessor Express-saml2 which could allow attackers to impersonate arbitrary users.